Really close now

I basically make a new blog post every day and typically when I come back after working on something or taking a break, I make a horizontal rule. So you can get a sense with the post volume here how long this blog engine build has been dragging on.

Most recently I have (with some LLM help) the nav elements styled to look and behave more or less presentable. Now I just have to add the appropriate link anchors into them.

I also realize just how important screenshots are at this point, it's almost pointless to show changes to CSS without also showing the changes in how it renders out in the browser.

But: I don't have a good image embedding workflow set up yet (I will be doing this a lot and need to come up with something awesomely streamlined for that!) and I almost cannot afford to creep the scope any longer or this site will never actually get published!

I may actually be able to make an exception on this one, though. My plan was to sync SSR'd content from stage/ under this repo into the root of my dedicated S3 bucket for the site. There would be a files/ folder in there as well, and the critical design element is a relief valve from checking heavy image/video/data files into the git repo. I was simply going to put a symlink in the repo so that files points at another place in my filesystem that is separately synchronized with the same S3 bucket's files/. Actually, I should be able to integrate this quite a bit... I could just design the sync procedure that I'm about to build to fully manage the files:

1. I can just add files/ to .gitignore in this repo
2. Whenever sync runs, it will sync all files under files/ from S3 into files/ in the repo
3. During the course of post authoring I generate and git add .md post files under blog/. Along the way I generate screenshots/photos/media to embed into these posts and store that content under file/ in the repo; Git will ignore them
4. Git push configured via hook to trigger this sync. The sync will also grab any new files and upload them to S3. I'll probably want to put a manual confirmation on this (since content made public is forever) but I'll not do that for now to streamline the workflow.
5. Because of (2), anything deleted locally that got into S3 will get restored. This way accidentally deleting anything from the repo and having the sync run will not cause data loss (just as deleting random content from a git repo and push will not cause data loss).
6. To really delete something I no longer need, or (and hopefully this never happens) in the event anything sensitive accidentally gets pushed to S3, I simply need to remove it from S3. Plenty of tools make this easy.

By the way, I noticed that documenting my planning clearly like this (to share it with all of you humans) gives me very useful and effective prose I can paste for an LLM to help me do the work. You see where this is going. This is turning out to be a whole lot of birds with one stone, I'm able to share what I'm learning with all of you, and at the same time I don't have to separately expend any effort crafting instructions to robots. In addition to that, making blogging a habit means I get to continually practice writing, which does so many things:

• It motivates me to continue to seek out interesting ideas to pursue.
• It improves the quality of my writing over time more consistently.
• It inherently gives me more opportunities to practice planning things out.
  • That helps me plan better
  • Helps me improve my estimation accuracy (nope, don't believe this)
  • Should bleed into better habits in terms of planning things out in general, not just building software
• It encourages writing retrospectives and postmortems for projects, which contributes to better future planning and enhances what we learn from experiences.
• It produces a record for me to reference and share that contains an organized account of what I accomplished
• It is very high quality context for bringing LLM systems up to speed. The quality of content intended for human consumption is much higher than the quality of content created with the sole intention of guiding mechanical systems. As a result, I get for free out of this a significant dataset which will help me gather more intuition about how best to prompt LLMs.

Anyway here's how this one is going:

<<<<<<< SEARCH
=======
#!/bin/bash

set -euo pipefail

BUCKET_NAME="www.stevenlu.net"
STAGE_DIR="stage"
FILES_DIR="files"

# Ensure AWS CLI is installed and configured
if ! command -v aws &> /dev/null; then
    echo "AWS CLI is not installed. Please install it and configure your credentials."
    exit 1
fi

# Sync files from S3 to local
echo "Syncing files from S3 to local..."
aws s3 sync "s3://${BUCKET_NAME}/${FILES_DIR}" "${FILES_DIR}"

# Build the site (assuming you have a build script)
echo "Building the site..."
node scripts/stage.ts

# Sync stage directory to S3
echo "Syncing stage directory to S3..."
aws s3 sync "${STAGE_DIR}" "s3://${BUCKET_NAME}" --delete

# Sync local files to S3
echo "Syncing local files to S3..."
aws s3 sync "${FILES_DIR}" "s3://${BUCKET_NAME}/${FILES_DIR}" --delete

echo "Sync complete!"
>>>>>>> REPLACE

chmod +x scripts/sync_s3.sh

#!/bin/bash
./scripts/sync_s3.sh

chmod +x .git/hooks/post-push

> Tokens: 9.1k sent, 586 received.
Cost: $0.04 message, $0.30 session. Use --no-stream for accurate caching costs.

scripts/sync_s3.sh
Create new file? (Y)es/(N)o [Yes]:
Applied edit to scripts/sync_s3.sh
Commit 80661c2 chore: Add script to sync S3 bucket with local files

chmod +x scripts/sync_s3.sh
Run shell command? (Y)es/(N)o/(S)kip all/(D)on't ask again [Yes]:

Running chmod +x scripts/sync_s3.sh

#!/bin/bash
./scripts/sync_s3.sh
Run shell command? (Y)es/(N)o/(S)kip all/(D)on't ask again [Yes]: n

chmod +x .git/hooks/post-push
Run shell command? (Y)es/(N)o/(S)kip all/(D)on't ask again [Yes]: n
You can use /undo to undo and discard each aider commit.

Couple of notes here, one is that I'm still exploring the best way to present LLM conversations. I get good results with aider as I've mentioned before, so if you've ever used that tool before the above formatting may look familiar. I'm currently planning to embed back and forth conversations with LLMs using "admonitions" styling in markdown, I think it should effectively highlight the conversation a little like chat bubbles, which feels like a natural way to present these types of exchanges. Since the majority of the output from LLMs is in markdown format, what's nice about this is that I can very easily dump sections from my .aider.chat.history.md files inside those and it should render beautifully. I'm just going to bring in the admonitions extension for Marked and don't expect it to be a big ordeal.

Another thing I notice is that typically when using LLMs we will tend to scan the output really quickly to search for the information that we're hoping for. Since aider is designed to automatically implement code changes that the LLM is instructed to perform, since I've been using it for a few months by now, only maybe half the time do we actually ever need to read the content that it spits out. I strongly believe that the best way to use tools like this is to automate as much as you can in the environment. What I mean by this is best shown with examples, and you can rest assured that a lot more of those will be coming this way.

The quick summary, though, is that it may take a minute for you to carefully review the result of an LLM driven code change. Of course it's a marvelous testament to what we have achieved as a civilization, it's a reality that has crashed into our lives out of the science fiction books.

But, practically speaking, spending a whole minute doing things like that is largely a poor use of time. Much better is for your code project to be already set up with automated builds and tests so that you know before you're able to read even a few sentences from the response whether the code compiles and whether it has broken any tests. Per my usual guidance, you would want to start out a project more with end to end tests and smoke tests that can give you a useful "green indicator", rather than diving into expansive test suites.

I'll conclude with another warning of something I have seen several times. I hope to capture some of these in detail in the coming months to illustrate, but I know many examples of these already exist in my project chat histories. You will get responses from LLMs confirming and agreeing with some approach that you instructed it to take with a problem, but then it goes ahead and does something entirely different. This is jarring for us because in this moment, the illusion that the LLM "understands what it's doing" gets broken for us.

We'll cover this topic in much more depth in an ongoing basis, but what I will say now is that my word choice of "illusion" was intentional.

The above was actually just another huge tangent. The thought that got me into it was just that I have indeed pasted the LLM's response into this blog post, sure, but I haven't even read its contents yet. Of course since I'm about to publish it soon, it would behoove me to review it in depth in a way that I would typically not.

Upon review, this is a fairly typical LLM interaction. The structure/layout of the script is impeccable, as we have come to expect, but there are a number of concerns that strike deep into data integrity concerns that the LLM hasn't picked up on my hints for.

And I also spotted something that could have been easy to miss, which was that actually the LLM responded with an intention to create a file named .git/hooks/post-push with the contents:

#!/bin/bash
./scripts/sync_s3.sh

yet you can see above that aider actually failed in this situation to properly handle that. Aider assumed that the code block was intended as bash script to execute, so it prompted me to check if I wanted to execute the body of that script as a one-off command. Subsequently it asks for permission to run the command to make the new post-push hook script executable, which clearly would have failed.

The particular mechanisms that lead to this failure are really subtle and I find it very instructive to explore this, as a way for us to gain some insight into the capabilities and limitations of these systems today.

You see, one of the conventions that aider has for composing and editing files is the

<<<<<<< SEARCH
=======
>>>>>>> REPLACE

edit format. This is referred to as the diff format because it uses what are basically a flavor of Git conflict markers to describe hunks of diff, by which I mean it specifies in the top section above the ======= some code to match (conceptually, selecting it) and then replaces it with the code seen in the rest. The syntax of this convention is that the path/name of the file is stated above the edit.

We already saw this scheme correctly applied during the creation of a new file above:

scripts/sync_s3.sh
```bash
<<<<<<< SEARCH
=======

but for the git post-push hook it tried to make it seemed to have forgotten its prompting and responded with:

To set it up as a post-push git hook, create a file .git/hooks/post-push with the following content:

#!/bin/bash
./scripts/sync_s3.sh

This of course is a reasonable output intended for a human to understand but aider fails to interpret it as a new file creation. Aider does interpret it as a command to attempt one-off, no doubt based off of some heuristics (possibly with the aid of a secondary LLM model) but it isn't very helpful to try to run that post push hook right now.

... And the real reason why I responded n to stop it from trying to execute the sync script is because I have no idea if it's safe to run yet. I would probably opt to disable aider from ever attempting to run scripts, but I do like to see the requests to see how well it's doing about interpreting responses!

Here's how this session resolved:

/ask part of what i was trying to hint at earlier (though I did not explicitly explain) was that I need this sync to be very careful and deliberate so that I don't risk data loss. I was also sloppy with terminology earlier using the word sync which prompted you to use sync, but I don't think we want sync because I never want remote files to be deleted if they are accidentally removed from the local fs and then a sync occurs (which it will regularly being part of (CI) automation). I want you to cp back to files from s3 initially, and furthermore (again my fault) the files/ dir should be inside stage/ so i dont think we need two separate sends, and they would also be cp's and not syncs. --- update: actally i just researched the s3 cli and it seems like sync without delete flag (as you have exactly done) is probably the ideal way to do this and NOT cp, because cp will re-transmit unchanged files, which I clearly have no interest in doing. What say you?  

#!/bin/bash

set -euo pipefail

BUCKET_NAME="www.stevenlu.net"
STAGE_DIR="stage"
FILES_DIR="${STAGE_DIR}/files"

# Ensure AWS CLI is installed and configured
if ! command -v aws &> /dev/null; then
    echo "AWS CLI is not installed. Please install it and configure your credentials."
    exit 1
fi

# Ensure stage directory exists
mkdir -p "${STAGE_DIR}"

# Sync files from S3 to local
echo "Syncing files from S3 to local..."
aws s3 sync "s3://${BUCKET_NAME}/files" "${FILES_DIR}"

# Build the site
echo "Building the site..."
node scripts/stage.ts

# Sync entire stage directory (including files) to S3
echo "Syncing stage directory to S3..."
aws s3 sync "${STAGE_DIR}" "s3://${BUCKET_NAME}"

echo "Sync complete!"

great. now that i can clearly see the logic, this script just does exactly only 3 things now. and one fo them is also unnecessary, as this script isn't meant to launch the build script. i actually run that off of file watching so the code is being rebuilt and the static output is being regenerated with each edit i make to the content so I've got that handled. Since it only does two straightforward sync operations I will opt instead to not use this script and just make these two aws s3 sync calls from the js aws sdk instead, in the stage.ts script. please adjust accordingly.

Understood. I'll modify the stage.ts script to include the S3 sync operations using the AWS SDK for JavaScript. We'll remove the separate shell script and integrate the sync functionality directly into the TypeScript code.

Here are the changes to stage.ts:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
import * as fs from 'fs';
const fsp = fs.promises;
import * as path from 'path';
import * as util from 'util';
import { fileURLToPath } from 'url';

import { Marked } from 'marked';
import { markedHighlight } from "marked-highlight";
import hljs from 'highlight.js';

import { AnsiUp } from './ansi_up.js';

import { process_markdeep } from './convert_markdeep.js';
=======
import * as fs from 'fs';
const fsp = fs.promises;
import * as path from 'path';
import * as util from 'util';
import { fileURLToPath } from 'url';

import { Marked } from 'marked';
import { markedHighlight } from "marked-highlight";
import hljs from 'highlight.js';

import { AnsiUp } from './ansi_up.js';

import { process_markdeep } from './convert_markdeep.js';

import { S3Client, S3 } from "@aws-sdk/client-s3";
>>>>>>> REPLACE

Now, let's add the S3 sync functions at the end of the file:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
  console.log('outFile:', outFile);
  await fsp.writeFile(outFile, processed);
}
=======
  console.log('outFile:', outFile);
  await fsp.writeFile(outFile, processed);
}

// S3 sync functions
const BUCKET_NAME = "www.stevenlu.net";
const s3Client = new S3Client({ region: "us-east-1" }); // Replace with your region
const s3 = new S3({ client: s3Client });

async function syncFromS3() {
  console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
  await s3.sync({
    Bucket: BUCKET_NAME,
    Prefix: "files/",
    LocalDir: path.join(targetDir, "files"),
    DeleteRemoved: false,
  });
}

async function syncToS3() {
  console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
  await s3.sync({
    LocalDir: targetDir,
    Bucket: BUCKET_NAME,
    DeleteRemoved: false,
  });
}

// Run the sync operations
await syncFromS3();
await syncToS3();

console.log("Sync complete!");
>>>>>>> REPLACE

These changes will:

1. Import the necessary AWS SDK modules.
2. Add functions to sync from and to S3 using the AWS SDK.
3. Run these sync operations after the site has been built.

To make these changes work, you'll need to install the AWS SDK for JavaScript. You can do this by running:

npm install @aws-sdk/client-s3

Also, make sure your AWS credentials are properly configured in your environment or in the ~/.aws/credentials file.

Now, when you run node scripts/stage.ts, it will build your site and sync with S3 in a single operation.

Tokens: 11k sent, 673 received. Cost: $0.04 message, $0.37 session. Use --no-stream for accurate caching costs.
Applied edit to scripts/stage.ts
Commit 85fddfa feat: integrate S3 sync operations into stage.ts
npm install @aws-sdk/client-s3
Run shell command? (Y)es/(N)o/(D)on't ask again [Yes]: y
Running npm install @aws-sdk/client-s3
Add command output to the chat? (Y)es/(N)o/(D)on't ask again [Yes]: n
You can use /undo to undo and discard each aider commit.

The only thing I have to do at this point is remove the now defunct sync_s3.sh script. I'm slightly torn on it because it would have been nice if the LLM remembered about it to clean it up, but I also kinda don't want it to waste nearly a thousand tokens recalling the content of the file just to put it into a diff hunk to remove its contents (and that might still leave me with an empty file). You can see how systems like this have a lot of little edge cases to streamline before you can count on them to reliably and (just as important) efficiently work on code at a high level. For now we need to keep a close eye on them.

In terms of loose ends here... this was not a wonderful session. I had to edit this SDK call to sync ${targetDir}/files/ instead of files/. This one was disappointing. I clearly already stated where files should live, but I guess it was going by my earlier instructions/overview from before.

It also seems to have flubbed the whole AWS SDK v3 S3 init as well as sync calls. I'm fairly certain that this is down to confusion about v2 and v3. For these LLMs if you don't have quite enough information in training to teach the model clearly the distinctions between different versions. Often there is just not enough comprehensive data on this in the internet. I would have hoped that AWS S3 SDK API would have seen enough content on this but then again v3 is somewhat new so it's understandable.

In this case the issue is even deeper. As we can see outlined here it's common knowledge that the JS SDK for S3 does not include sync functionality, and if we call it from js we need to implement our own sync logic. I wouldn't have a problem with this in principle, but it's clear seeing this above exchange that in this instance Claude decided to just try what I asked for (call sync, which is a nonexistent API) instead of informing me that it would be a much more involved implementation. Since this got me curious, I wanted to pull on this thread some more. It kicks off with our trademark Claude grotesque sycophancy:

/ask there is no sync interface in the SDK API! did you know?

I apologize for the confusion. You're absolutely right, and I made a mistake in my previous suggestion. The AWS SDK for JavaScript (v3) doesn't have a direct sync method like the AWS CLI does. I should have verified this before suggesting it. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Given this information, we'll need to implement our own sync-like functionality using the available SDK methods. Here's how we can modify the stage.ts file to achieve a similar result:

1. We'll use ListObjectsV2Command to list objects in the S3 bucket.
2. We'll use GetObjectCommand to download files from S3.
3. We'll use PutObjectCommand to upload files to S3.

Let's update the stage.ts file with these changes:

import { S3Client, ListObjectsV2Command, GetObjectCommand, PutObjectCommand } from "@aws-sdk/client-s3";

// ... (rest of the existing imports)

const BUCKET_NAME = "www.stevenlu.net";
const s3Client = new S3Client({ region: "us-east-1" }); // Replace with your region

async function syncFromS3() {
  console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
  const listParams = {
    Bucket: BUCKET_NAME,
    Prefix: "files/"
  };

  try {
    const listCommand = new ListObjectsV2Command(listParams);
    const data = await s3Client.send(listCommand);

    if (data.Contents) {
      for (const object of data.Contents) {
        if (object.Key) {
          const getParams = {
            Bucket: BUCKET_NAME,
            Key: object.Key
          };
          const getCommand = new GetObjectCommand(getParams);
          const response = await s3Client.send(getCommand);

          if (response.Body) {
            const localFilePath = path.join(targetDir, object.Key);
            await fsp.mkdir(path.dirname(localFilePath), { recursive: true });
            const fileStream = fs.createWriteStream(localFilePath);
            response.Body.pipe(fileStream);
          }
        }
      }
    }
  } catch (error) {
    console.error("Error syncing from S3:", error);
  }
}

async function syncToS3() {
  console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
  try {
    const files = await getAllFiles(targetDir);
    for (const file of files) {
      const fileContent = await fsp.readFile(file);
      const key = path.relative(targetDir, file);
      const putParams = {
        Bucket: BUCKET_NAME,
        Key: key,
        Body: fileContent
      };
      const putCommand = new PutObjectCommand(putParams);
      await s3Client.send(putCommand);
    }
  } catch (error) {
    console.error("Error syncing to S3:", error);
  }
}

async function getAllFiles(dir: string): Promise<string[]> {
  const entries = await fsp.readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true });
  const files = await Promise.all(entries.map((entry) => {
    const res = path.resolve(dir, entry.name);
    return entry.isDirectory() ? getAllFiles(res) : res;
  }));
  return files.flat();
}

// ... (rest of the existing code)

// Run the sync operations
await syncFromS3();
await syncToS3();

console.log("Sync complete!");

This implementation will:

1. Download all files from the "files/" prefix in the S3 bucket to the local stage/files/ directory.
2. Upload all files from the stage/ directory (including the files/ subdirectory) to the S3 bucket.

Note that this implementation doesn't delete files that exist in one location but not the other, which aligns with your requirement to avoid accidental deletions. If a file is removed locally, it will still exist in S3, and if a file is removed from S3, it will be re-uploaded from the local directory.

Remember to install the necessary AWS SDK packages:

npm install @aws-sdk/client-s3

This solution should provide the functionality you need while addressing the lack of a direct sync method in the AWS SDK.

Tokens: 9.3k sent, 889 received. Cost: $0.04 message, $0.41 session. Use --no-stream for accurate caching costs.

I knew you were going to write a whole sync for me, but today i'm not ready to add such a degree of maintenance surface to this. For this current task I would like us to return to the CLI. Let's simply launch the CLI calls (we had them earlier) with execSync in the stage.ts script.

Understood. Let's modify the stage.ts script to use execSync for running the AWS CLI commands. We'll add the sync operations at the end of the file.

Here's the change we need to make:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
// Run the sync operations
await syncFromS3();
await syncToS3();

console.log("Sync complete!");
=======
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

// Run the sync operations
console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://${BUCKET_NAME}/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://${BUCKET_NAME}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
>>>>>>> REPLACE

This change will:

1. Import the execSync function from the child_process module.
2. Use execSync to run the AWS CLI commands for syncing from and to S3.
3. Use stdio: 'inherit' to show the output of the commands in the console.

Make sure you have the AWS CLI installed and configured on your system for this to work. If you haven't installed it yet, you can do so by running:

npm install -g aws-cli

And then configure it with your AWS credentials:

aws configure

After making these changes, you can run the script as before:

node scripts/stage.ts

This will build your site and then sync with S3 using the AWS CLI commands.

Tokens: 12k sent, 358 received. Cost: $0.04 message, $0.46 session. Use --no-stream for accurate caching costs.
Committing scripts/stage.ts before applying edits.
Commit cc0945b fix: remove unused S3 sync functions

> The LLM did not conform to the edit format.  
> https://aider.chat/docs/troubleshooting/edit-errors.html  

> # 1 SEARCH/REPLACE block failed to match!

## SearchReplaceNoExactMatch: This SEARCH block failed to exactly match lines in scripts/stage.ts
<<<<<<< SEARCH
// Run the sync operations
await syncFromS3();
await syncToS3();

console.log("Sync complete!");
=======
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

// Run the sync operations
console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://${BUCKET_NAME}/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://${BUCKET_NAME}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
>>>>>>> REPLACE

The SEARCH section must exactly match an existing block of lines including all white space, comments, indentation, docstrings, etc  

I apologize for the confusion. You're right, the SEARCH block didn't match the existing content. Let's modify the stage.ts script to add the S3 sync operations using execSync. Here's the correct change:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
// deliver the pages/ pages as essentially one-off Marked blog posts.
const pages_files = [
  'pages/about.md',
  'index.md'
];
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(__dirname, '..', 'stage', 'pages'));
for (const file of pages_files) {
  const content = await fsp.readFile(path.join(__dirname, '..', file), 'utf8');
  const processed = `<meta charset="UTF-8">`
    + `<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/resources/hljs/default.min.css" />`
    + await marked.parse(content);
  const outFile = path.join(targetDir, file.replace(/\.md$/, '.html'));
  console.log('outFile:', outFile);
  await fsp.writeFile(outFile, processed);
}
=======
// deliver the pages/ pages as essentially one-off Marked blog posts.
const pages_files = [
  'pages/about.md',
  'index.md'
];
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(__dirname, '..', 'stage', 'pages'));
for (const file of pages_files) {
  const content = await fsp.readFile(path.join(__dirname, '..', file), 'utf8');
  const processed = `<meta charset="UTF-8">`
    + `<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/resources/hljs/default.min.css" />`
    + await marked.parse(content);
  const outFile = path.join(targetDir, file.replace(/\.md$/, '.html'));
  console.log('outFile:', outFile);
  await fsp.writeFile(outFile, processed);
}

// Run the sync operations
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://${process.env.BUCKET_NAME}/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://${process.env.BUCKET_NAME}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
>>>>>>> REPLACE

This change will:

1. Import the execSync function from the child_process module.
2. Use execSync to run the AWS CLI commands for syncing from and to S3.
3. Use stdio: 'inherit' to show the output of the commands in the console.
4. Use process.env.BUCKET_NAME to access the bucket name from environment variables.

Make sure you have the AWS CLI installed and configured on your system for this to work. If you haven't installed it yet, you can do so by running:

npm install -g aws-cli

And then configure it with your AWS credentials:

aws configure

Also, make sure to set the BUCKET_NAME environment variable before running the script:

export BUCKET_NAME=your-bucket-name

After making these changes, you can run the script as before:

node scripts/stage.ts

This will build your site and then sync with S3 using the AWS CLI commands.

Tokens: 7.9k sent, 709 received. Cost: $0.03 message, $0.49 session. Use --no-stream for accurate caching costs.
Applied edit to scripts/stage.ts
Commit 0d21103 feat: Add S3 sync operations to stage.ts
npm install -g aws-cli

Alright, that was a big response. There was a diff hunk matching hiccup but it figured it out. I can see a failure though, since my stage.ts build script is automated on file changes right now. (kinda dangerous!)

Syncing files from S3 to local...
fatal error: An error occurred (AccessDenied) when calling the ListObjectsV2 operation: Access Denied
node:internal/errors:984
  const err = new Error(message);
              ^

Error: Command failed: aws s3 sync s3://undefined/files /Users/slu/stevenlu.net/stage/files
    at genericNodeError (node:internal/errors:984:15)
    at wrappedFn (node:internal/errors:538:14)
    at checkExecSyncError (node:child_process:890:11)
    at execSync (node:child_process:962:15)
    at <anonymous> (/Users/slu/stevenlu.net/scripts/stage.ts:385:1) {
  status: 1,
  signal: null,
  output: [ null, null, null ],
  pid: 98570,
  stdout: null,
  stderr: null
}

Node.js v21.7.3
[Command exited with 1]

The error of course is obvious. All I should need to do here is change it from using that BUCKET_NAME env var into being hardcoded.

// Run the sync operations
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");

Syncing files from S3 to local...
Syncing stage directory to S3...
upload: stage/blog/airtags.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/airtags.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/12.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/12.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/11.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/11.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/13.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/13.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/4.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/4.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/1.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/1.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/3.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/3.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/10.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/10.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/14.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/14.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/6.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/6.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/2.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/2.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/5.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/5.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/7.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/7.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/index.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/index.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/8.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/8.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/7.1.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/7.1.html
upload: stage/blog/code-as-graphs.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/code-as-graphs.html
upload: stage/blog/index.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/index.html
upload: stage/blog/css-love-letter.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/css-love-letter.html
upload: stage/blog/test/a.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/test/a.html
upload: stage/blog/test/b.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/test/b.html
upload: stage/blog/test2/aa.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/test2/aa.html
upload: stage/pages/about.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/pages/about.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/9.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/9.html
upload: stage/blog/test2/index.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/test2/index.html
upload: stage/blog/test/index.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/test/index.html
upload: stage/index.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/index.html
upload: stage/blog/silly-metablog-ideas.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/silly-metablog-ideas.html
upload: stage/resources/hljs/default.min.css to s3://www.stevenlu.net/resources/hljs/default.min.css
upload: stage/resources/markdeep/journal.css to s3://www.stevenlu.net/resources/markdeep/journal.css
Sync complete!
[Command was successful]

I could certainly move forward at this point but, ever the perfectionist, I need to get to the bottom of a few important aspects of this:

Great. I get output like this: Syncing files from S3 to local...

Syncing stage directory to S3...

upload: stage/blog/airtags.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/airtags.html

upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/11.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/11.html

upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/12.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/12.html

upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/1.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/1.html

Now the question I have is how can i configure this command call to show some particulars about which content is unchanged and not transferred and how much data was transferred in total, and so on? Be aware my blog SSR HTML files are re-generated with each call of this script so all those files are indeed fresh, so if i need to do something extra to avoid re-transfer we may need to change tack here.

To address your requirements, we can modify the aws s3 sync commands to include additional flags that will provide more detailed information about the sync process. Here's how we can update the stage.ts file:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
=======
console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
>>>>>>> REPLACE

These changes do the following:

1. We've added a --dryrun command before each actual sync. This will show what changes would be made without actually making them.
2. We've added the --delete flag to both sync commands. This ensures that files deleted locally are also removed from S3, and vice versa.
3. For the upload to S3, we've added the --size-only flag. This compares files based on size only, not on modification time. This can help avoid unnecessary uploads of files that have been regenerated but haven't actually changed in content.

The --dryrun commands will show you which files would be transferred and which would be skipped. The actual sync commands that follow will perform the transfer.

To see the total amount of data transferred, you can wrap the sync commands with the time command in Unix-like systems. Here's how you can do that:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
=======
console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`time aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`time aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
>>>>>>> REPLACE

The time command will provide information about the execution time and system resource usage of the sync operations.

These changes should give you more detailed information about which files are being transferred, which are unchanged, and how much data is being transferred in total. The --size-only flag should help avoid unnecessary transfers of regenerated files that haven't actually changed in content.

Tokens: 8.9k sent, 951 received. Cost: $0.04 message, $0.53 session. Use --no-stream for accurate caching costs.
Committing scripts/stage.ts before applying edits.
Commit 849c874 fix: Update S3 bucket names in staging script
Applied edit to scripts/stage.ts
Commit d59fdef build: Add --delete and --size-only flags to s3 sync commands
You can use /undo to undo and discard each aider commit.

Now the output looks like this:

Syncing files from S3 to local...

real    0m0.419s
user    0m0.256s
sys     0m0.069s
Syncing stage directory to S3...
(dryrun) upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/14.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/14.html
upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/14.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/14.html

real    0m0.697s
user    0m0.275s
sys     0m0.073s
Sync complete!

I'm not really very happy about that, so we continue:

do you think we could improve this a bit? in the vast majority of cases the file/ sync downward (first sync) is going to do no work. I suppose if the sync command properly resolves to doing no transfer if no files need to be transferred, then this is fine, but I'd like us to get a data transferred metric working here. Also, the concept of running a dry run followed by a regular run immediately afterward (without even checking any of its output) is questionable for me, it would appear to just be a waste of time to do that. I don't believe we need any of these dry runs. I see size only was specified but i dont see sizes, i do see though that only the recently changed blog 14.html file got uploaded which is correct, but i'm not seeing output pertaining to the size of upload.

This is what I see now, for context:

Syncing files from S3 to local...

real 0m0.419s

user 0m0.256s

sys 0m0.069s

Syncing stage directory to S3...

(dryrun) upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/14.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/14.html

upload: stage/blog/blog-engine/14.html to s3://www.stevenlu.net/blog/blog-engine/14.html

real 0m0.697s

user 0m0.275s

sys 0m0.073s

Sync complete!

You're right, we can improve this script to make it more efficient and informative. Let's make the following changes:

1. Remove the dry runs as they're not providing much value.
2. Add the --stats flag to get information about the data transferred.
3. Only perform the download sync if there are actually files to sync.
4. Use set -e to exit the script if any command fails.

Here's the proposed change:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
// Run the sync operations
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

console.log("Syncing files from S3 to local...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`time aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --dryrun`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
execSync(`time aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
=======
// Run the sync operations
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

console.log("Checking for files to sync from S3 to local...");
const filesToSync = execSync(`aws s3 ls s3://www.stevenlu.net/files --recursive | wc -l`).toString().trim();

if (parseInt(filesToSync) > 0) {
  console.log(`Found ${filesToSync} files to sync. Syncing files from S3 to local...`);
  execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete --stats`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
} else {
  console.log("No files to sync from S3 to local.");
}

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --stats`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
>>>>>>> REPLACE

Now, let's create a new shell script to handle the S3 sync operations. This will allow us to use shell features like set -e and make the TypeScript file cleaner.

scripts/sync_s3.sh

<<<<<<< SEARCH
=======
#!/bin/bash
set -e

TARGET_DIR="$1"
if [ -z "$TARGET_DIR" ]; then
    echo "Error: Target directory not provided"
    exit 1
fi

echo "Checking for files to sync from S3 to local..."
FILES_TO_SYNC=$(aws s3 ls s3://www.stevenlu.net/files --recursive | wc -l)

if [ "$FILES_TO_SYNC" -gt 0 ]; then
    echo "Found $FILES_TO_SYNC files to sync. Syncing files from S3 to local..."
    aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files "$TARGET_DIR/files" --delete --stats
else
    echo "No files to sync from S3 to local."
fi

echo "Syncing stage directory to S3..."
aws s3 sync "$TARGET_DIR" s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --stats

echo "Sync complete!"
>>>>>>> REPLACE

Now, let's update the stage.ts file to use this new shell script:

scripts/stage.ts

<<<<<<< SEARCH
// Run the sync operations
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

console.log("Checking for files to sync from S3 to local...");
const filesToSync = execSync(`aws s3 ls s3://www.stevenlu.net/files --recursive | wc -l`).toString().trim();

if (parseInt(filesToSync) > 0) {
  console.log(`Found ${filesToSync} files to sync. Syncing files from S3 to local...`);
  execSync(`aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files ${path.join(targetDir, 'files')} --delete --stats`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
} else {
  console.log("No files to sync from S3 to local.");
}

console.log("Syncing stage directory to S3...");
execSync(`aws s3 sync ${targetDir} s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --stats`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

console.log("Sync complete!");
=======
// Run the sync operations
import { execSync } from 'child_process';

console.log("Running S3 sync operations...");
execSync(`bash ${path.join(__dirname, 'sync_s3.sh')} ${targetDir}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });
>>>>>>> REPLACE

These changes will:

1. Remove the dry runs.
2. Add the --stats flag to get information about the data transferred.
3. Only perform the download sync if there are actually files to sync.
4. Use set -e in the shell script to exit if any command fails.
5. Move the sync logic to a separate shell script for better error handling and cleaner TypeScript code.

To make these changes effective, you'll need to:

1. Update the stage.ts file as shown above.
2. Create the new sync_s3.sh file in the scripts directory.
3. Make the sync_s3.sh file executable by running:

chmod +x scripts/sync_s3.sh

These changes should provide you with more detailed information about the sync process, including the amount of data transferred, and make the sync operation more efficient by avoiding unnecessary operations.

Tokens: 7.9k sent, 1.2k received. Cost: $0.04 message, $0.57 session. Use --no-stream for accurate caching costs.
Committing scripts/sync_s3.sh before applying edits.
Commit f3ba39d chore: remove unused sync_s3.sh script
Applied edit to scripts/sync_s3.sh
Applied edit to scripts/stage.ts
Commit b537186 feat: Improve S3 sync script
chmod +x scripts/sync_s3.sh

It made a shell script for me again, I'm cool with that. But, I needed to edit its launch because __dirname when launching the stage.ts script is actually under build/, so I needed to change it to

execSync(`bash ${path.join(__dirname, '..', 'scripts', 'sync_s3.sh')} ${targetDir}`, { stdio: 'inherit' });

... And at this point I'm getting frustrated! Look at what it did in the new shell script:

echo "Checking for files to sync from S3 to local..."
FILES_TO_SYNC=$(aws s3 ls s3://www.stevenlu.net/files --recursive | wc -l)

if [ "$FILES_TO_SYNC" -gt 0 ]; then
    echo "Found $FILES_TO_SYNC files to sync. Syncing files from S3 to local..."
    aws s3 sync s3://www.stevenlu.net/files "$TARGET_DIR/files" --delete --stats
else
    echo "No files to sync from S3 to local."
fi

echo "Syncing stage directory to S3..."
aws s3 sync "$TARGET_DIR" s3://www.stevenlu.net --size-only --delete --stats

So many issues here. I clearly just prompted explaining that we can just do a regular sync to download files/ from s3 to local, and yet it went and made an s3 ls --recursive call. And why? In order to do a totally useless check to see if i have any files at all in order to skip the sync call if there are 0 files. It's not wrong to do this per se, but it's very much not the intent of what I was trying to prompt.

It also inexplicably introduced the --delete flag into the sync calls even though just earlier we had a clear discussion around why it would be important for us to avoid using specifically that flag.

The cherry on top is that --stats is not a valid flag, so we got a nice big hallucination in here too.

The whole goal of getting a transfer size summary is called into question with the discovery of this topic.

I will very likely need to use the --size-only flag because the modified time of these generated HTML files will always be newer, and I'd like to save bandwidth here where practical. So at least it got something right.

This was a very disappointing end to the session.

And that's a wrap! Whew. I was about to say that this session was a wash, but with the way it ended, it has turned out to be one of the worst experiences I've had with LLM coding in recent memory.

I also realized it's really silly to do the sync as part of the build, they are totally separate workflows (I edit and save files very frequently). So I introduced a post-push hook (like the LLM suggested earlier) to launch it from, which is a lot more reasonable. As we recall I was originally planning on hooking that up with CI in Github Actions but there is really no need for that yet, I'd actually rather just keep my aws credentials local to my dev machine for now and the workflow is the same: Save files to test the build locally. Deploy on push.

Wow, I got bamboozled again! There is no post-push hook... I guess I really might want to set up CI in GitHub (typically those launch based on post-receive on the server) just for some conceptual cleanliness there. But, for now I can definitely run this deployment pre-push. This is actually really funny because I've had the exact same experience, why wouldn't git give us a post-push hook?... It's pretty hilarious that the LLM seems to have thought the same.

In the course of testing this thing I'm already live! Of course without much navigation in place (I still need to assemble the link anchors), it's very unlikely for anybody to discover my page right now. I have had a nonzero presence on my domains for many years, I'd just been hosting a pitifully basic index.html file for most of that time. The browser spiders will come soon after I get links working. I need to test out image embedding too now that I do have a solution in place for the files/ dir.

...And here it is! It works.

So this is what the nav looks like now! It's not great but it's something and I have been really fond of position: sticky; lately. First image! hooray.